This makes a lot of sense. During the daytime, most people are working or otherwise preoccupied, and reserving facility use for the school fits within the school schedule. By the time most people are free for recreational activities, these facilities are also free to host them, having finished with the school day. Isn't it neat how the availability fits the user? In a nutshell, joint-use effectively doubles the usability of a building. For communities-especially smaller ones-such facilities provide an efficient and economical amenity for the general population. Instead of building a separate library or theater or gymnasium, everyone can share!
The sharing crosses over to finances as well. Joint-use facilities are typically partly funded by the city in which they're built, reducing immediate economic burden to the school district. And, as eluded to before, the city doesn't have to pay the cost of a full new building. Agreements can be worked out to divide the payment of utilities and operating costs as well. The result is an integrative and quite sustainable manner of providing conveniences to the neighborhood.
Such benefits are not without their complications. The biggest issue tends to be security. Many schools operate under a closed campus system, so that students can be properly monitored and campus grounds can be
In addition, school designers must also now consider that the building users are no longer just the population of a school, but also of a city, so additional programmatic requirements and design nuances may come into play.
Nevertheless, this provides a great way to tie a community together and make school an even more important part of residents' daily lives. As social trends move toward maximizing efficiency and unifying communities, joint-use facilities will become an even more vital and regular part of school design-and community design as well!